Engaging with an HR practitioner—whether for hiring, consulting, or advisory support—is often more complex than it appears. Human resource capability is not built only through formal education; it is largely shaped by hands‑on experience and depth of exposure.
Human resources as a profession typically derives only about thirty percent of its capability from classroom learning, certifications, and formal education. The remaining seventy percent comes from on‑the‑job exposure, problem‑solving, and handling complex people situations.
This makes it difficult to judge HR capability purely by looking at degrees, certifications, or resumes.
Not all HR practitioners operate at the same level of expertise. Some may be suitable for execution‑focused roles, while others are capable of strategic advisory work.
Understanding this distinction is critical when deciding whether an HR professional should support a specific project, advise senior leadership, or strengthen an internal HR team.
A strong HR practitioner not only has breadth of knowledge across HR domains, but also depth in specific areas. This depth becomes visible when they are able to explain concepts beyond surface‑level definitions.
For example, a compensation practitioner should be able to discuss salary ranges, quartiles, percentile positioning, and long‑term compensation progression—not just basic pay structures.
Experienced HR practitioners are able to connect people decisions with business outcomes. They can discuss payroll budgets, profitability, margins, and cost‑benefit trade‑offs with the same confidence as they discuss HR policies.
Rather than allocating budgets passively, they work backwards from business objectives to design people systems that support those goals.
Evaluating HR expertise requires asking probing questions and encouraging deeper explanations. Asking an HR professional to explain how a process is designed, implemented, and measured often reveals the true depth of their experience.
Reference checks with supervisors and peers are also far more valuable than generic feedback from business stakeholders.
Interviewing HR professionals requires an understanding of HR itself. This is why many organisations now involve experienced HR practitioners to interview and assess HR candidates.
Treating HR capability as a specialised skill—and building systems to identify it—ensures that organisations hire HR professionals who can truly deliver impact.
HR is not a function where capability can be assumed based on credentials alone. It must be evaluated through experience, judgement, and the ability to link people practices to organisational outcomes.
When organisations recognise HR expertise as a skill in its own right, they are better positioned to build effective and credible HR functions.
This article is based on the transcript of the original podcast of the same name featured in India HR Guide.
The transcript has been translated into this article with the support of AI and a human‑in‑the‑loop process.